The Application of Copy Number Variations Sequencing in Abortive Tissues and Cause Analysis for The Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: A Retrospective Analysis of 662 Patients

Authors

  • jin li Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5041-8507
  • Jianhong Ma Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University Author
  • Yuanzhen Zhang Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University Author
  • Yating Cheng Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University Author
  • Shuyang Sheng Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University Author
  • Xin Jin Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University Author
  • Xueping Qiu Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University Author
  • Na Yang Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University Author
  • Na Gao Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University Author
  • Guangming Ye Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University Author
  • Li Yu Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University Author
  • Jie Duan Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University Author
  • Hui Hu Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University Author
  • Fang Zheng Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University Author

Keywords:

prenatal and preimplantation genetic diagnosis, copy number variation, miscarriage, infertility practice

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to explore the copy number variations (CNVs) associated with miscarriage.

Methods: A total of 662 specimens of aborted embryonic tissue and 54 samples from peripheral blood were collected. Next generation sequencing for CNV analysis was performed to determine the type and clinical significance of possible CNVs, and relevant medical records were collected.

Results: Trisomy 16 was the most frequent single trisomy, followed by trisomy 22, trisomy 15 and trisomy 21. The rate of chromosomal abnormalities of fetuses in early pregnancy (65.4%) was higher than that of fetuses in middle pregnancy (16.4%). There were 82 pregnant women with recurrent abortion, and the embryo with pathogenic CNVs was conceived in 62 (76%) cases, while the embryo with variants of unknown significance (VUS) in 12 (15%) cases. Among the 27 couples with a history of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL), there were 4 (14.8%) couples with CNV abnormal in both partners, 16 (59.3%) couples with CNV abnormal only in the women, and 7 (25.9%) couples with CNV abnormal only in the men. 

Conclusion: These retrospective analyses of CNV-seq results provided a reference for genetic counseling of the relationship between VUS and recurrent pregnancy loss.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-01

How to Cite

The Application of Copy Number Variations Sequencing in Abortive Tissues and Cause Analysis for The Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: A Retrospective Analysis of 662 Patients. (2024). The Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 67(1), 491-499. https://www.thereproductivemedicine.com/Home/article/view/34

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.